Review





Similar Products

99
New England Biolabs hiscribe t7 arca mrna kit
Generation of 5′ UTR library for T cell-specific gene expression (A) General scheme of <t>mRNA</t> constructs used throughout the research. The constructs are composed of replaceable 5′ UTRs, KOZAK sequence, a gene of interest (GOI), a conserved 3′ UTR of HBA1 which is shared in all constructs, and a poly-A sequence. (B) GC/AU contents for each 5′ UTR used in the study. (C) Centroid secondary structure and free energy for EGFP-encoding constructs using the 5′ UTR of TOX , HBA1 , and CD39 ( ENTPD1 ). (D) Psuedouridine-corrected centroid secondary structure and free energy for EGFP-encoding constructs using the 5′ UTR of IL 2 , HBA1 , and CD247 . (E) Centroid free-energy calculation for all 14 constructs using either native uridine or pseudouridine. The blue-dashed line represents the mean of the native uridine calculation, and the red line represents the mean of the psuedouridine calculation. ∗ p < 0.05, paired t test. (F) Distribution of centroid free energy of all 14 EGFP encoding constructs including HBA1 5′ UTR, corrected for the usage of pseudouridine instead of native uridine. Constructs with energy lower than HBA1 5′ UTR are predicted to be more stable and thus enhance expression, while constructs with energy higher than HBA1 5′ UTR are predicated to be less stable and impair expression.
Hiscribe T7 Arca Mrna Kit, supplied by New England Biolabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/hiscribe t7 arca mrna kit/product/New England Biolabs
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hiscribe t7 arca mrna kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher dynabeads mrna direct micro kit
Generation of 5′ UTR library for T cell-specific gene expression (A) General scheme of <t>mRNA</t> constructs used throughout the research. The constructs are composed of replaceable 5′ UTRs, KOZAK sequence, a gene of interest (GOI), a conserved 3′ UTR of HBA1 which is shared in all constructs, and a poly-A sequence. (B) GC/AU contents for each 5′ UTR used in the study. (C) Centroid secondary structure and free energy for EGFP-encoding constructs using the 5′ UTR of TOX , HBA1 , and CD39 ( ENTPD1 ). (D) Psuedouridine-corrected centroid secondary structure and free energy for EGFP-encoding constructs using the 5′ UTR of IL 2 , HBA1 , and CD247 . (E) Centroid free-energy calculation for all 14 constructs using either native uridine or pseudouridine. The blue-dashed line represents the mean of the native uridine calculation, and the red line represents the mean of the psuedouridine calculation. ∗ p < 0.05, paired t test. (F) Distribution of centroid free energy of all 14 EGFP encoding constructs including HBA1 5′ UTR, corrected for the usage of pseudouridine instead of native uridine. Constructs with energy lower than HBA1 5′ UTR are predicted to be more stable and thus enhance expression, while constructs with energy higher than HBA1 5′ UTR are predicated to be less stable and impair expression.
Dynabeads Mrna Direct Micro Kit, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dynabeads mrna direct micro kit/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dynabeads mrna direct micro kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Moderna mrna 3927
Generation of 5′ UTR library for T cell-specific gene expression (A) General scheme of <t>mRNA</t> constructs used throughout the research. The constructs are composed of replaceable 5′ UTRs, KOZAK sequence, a gene of interest (GOI), a conserved 3′ UTR of HBA1 which is shared in all constructs, and a poly-A sequence. (B) GC/AU contents for each 5′ UTR used in the study. (C) Centroid secondary structure and free energy for EGFP-encoding constructs using the 5′ UTR of TOX , HBA1 , and CD39 ( ENTPD1 ). (D) Psuedouridine-corrected centroid secondary structure and free energy for EGFP-encoding constructs using the 5′ UTR of IL 2 , HBA1 , and CD247 . (E) Centroid free-energy calculation for all 14 constructs using either native uridine or pseudouridine. The blue-dashed line represents the mean of the native uridine calculation, and the red line represents the mean of the psuedouridine calculation. ∗ p < 0.05, paired t test. (F) Distribution of centroid free energy of all 14 EGFP encoding constructs including HBA1 5′ UTR, corrected for the usage of pseudouridine instead of native uridine. Constructs with energy lower than HBA1 5′ UTR are predicted to be more stable and thus enhance expression, while constructs with energy higher than HBA1 5′ UTR are predicated to be less stable and impair expression.
Mrna 3927, supplied by Moderna, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mrna 3927/product/Moderna
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mrna 3927 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Moderna mrna 3745
Generation of 5′ UTR library for T cell-specific gene expression (A) General scheme of <t>mRNA</t> constructs used throughout the research. The constructs are composed of replaceable 5′ UTRs, KOZAK sequence, a gene of interest (GOI), a conserved 3′ UTR of HBA1 which is shared in all constructs, and a poly-A sequence. (B) GC/AU contents for each 5′ UTR used in the study. (C) Centroid secondary structure and free energy for EGFP-encoding constructs using the 5′ UTR of TOX , HBA1 , and CD39 ( ENTPD1 ). (D) Psuedouridine-corrected centroid secondary structure and free energy for EGFP-encoding constructs using the 5′ UTR of IL 2 , HBA1 , and CD247 . (E) Centroid free-energy calculation for all 14 constructs using either native uridine or pseudouridine. The blue-dashed line represents the mean of the native uridine calculation, and the red line represents the mean of the psuedouridine calculation. ∗ p < 0.05, paired t test. (F) Distribution of centroid free energy of all 14 EGFP encoding constructs including HBA1 5′ UTR, corrected for the usage of pseudouridine instead of native uridine. Constructs with energy lower than HBA1 5′ UTR are predicted to be more stable and thus enhance expression, while constructs with energy higher than HBA1 5′ UTR are predicated to be less stable and impair expression.
Mrna 3745, supplied by Moderna, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mrna 3745/product/Moderna
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mrna 3745 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Moderna mrna 3705
Generation of 5′ UTR library for T cell-specific gene expression (A) General scheme of <t>mRNA</t> constructs used throughout the research. The constructs are composed of replaceable 5′ UTRs, KOZAK sequence, a gene of interest (GOI), a conserved 3′ UTR of HBA1 which is shared in all constructs, and a poly-A sequence. (B) GC/AU contents for each 5′ UTR used in the study. (C) Centroid secondary structure and free energy for EGFP-encoding constructs using the 5′ UTR of TOX , HBA1 , and CD39 ( ENTPD1 ). (D) Psuedouridine-corrected centroid secondary structure and free energy for EGFP-encoding constructs using the 5′ UTR of IL 2 , HBA1 , and CD247 . (E) Centroid free-energy calculation for all 14 constructs using either native uridine or pseudouridine. The blue-dashed line represents the mean of the native uridine calculation, and the red line represents the mean of the psuedouridine calculation. ∗ p < 0.05, paired t test. (F) Distribution of centroid free energy of all 14 EGFP encoding constructs including HBA1 5′ UTR, corrected for the usage of pseudouridine instead of native uridine. Constructs with energy lower than HBA1 5′ UTR are predicted to be more stable and thus enhance expression, while constructs with energy higher than HBA1 5′ UTR are predicated to be less stable and impair expression.
Mrna 3705, supplied by Moderna, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mrna 3705/product/Moderna
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mrna 3705 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Moderna mrna based vaccines
Generation of 5′ UTR library for T cell-specific gene expression (A) General scheme of <t>mRNA</t> constructs used throughout the research. The constructs are composed of replaceable 5′ UTRs, KOZAK sequence, a gene of interest (GOI), a conserved 3′ UTR of HBA1 which is shared in all constructs, and a poly-A sequence. (B) GC/AU contents for each 5′ UTR used in the study. (C) Centroid secondary structure and free energy for EGFP-encoding constructs using the 5′ UTR of TOX , HBA1 , and CD39 ( ENTPD1 ). (D) Psuedouridine-corrected centroid secondary structure and free energy for EGFP-encoding constructs using the 5′ UTR of IL 2 , HBA1 , and CD247 . (E) Centroid free-energy calculation for all 14 constructs using either native uridine or pseudouridine. The blue-dashed line represents the mean of the native uridine calculation, and the red line represents the mean of the psuedouridine calculation. ∗ p < 0.05, paired t test. (F) Distribution of centroid free energy of all 14 EGFP encoding constructs including HBA1 5′ UTR, corrected for the usage of pseudouridine instead of native uridine. Constructs with energy lower than HBA1 5′ UTR are predicted to be more stable and thus enhance expression, while constructs with energy higher than HBA1 5′ UTR are predicated to be less stable and impair expression.
Mrna Based Vaccines, supplied by Moderna, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mrna based vaccines/product/Moderna
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mrna based vaccines - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Moderna moderna s covid 19 mrna vaccines
Generation of 5′ UTR library for T cell-specific gene expression (A) General scheme of <t>mRNA</t> constructs used throughout the research. The constructs are composed of replaceable 5′ UTRs, KOZAK sequence, a gene of interest (GOI), a conserved 3′ UTR of HBA1 which is shared in all constructs, and a poly-A sequence. (B) GC/AU contents for each 5′ UTR used in the study. (C) Centroid secondary structure and free energy for EGFP-encoding constructs using the 5′ UTR of TOX , HBA1 , and CD39 ( ENTPD1 ). (D) Psuedouridine-corrected centroid secondary structure and free energy for EGFP-encoding constructs using the 5′ UTR of IL 2 , HBA1 , and CD247 . (E) Centroid free-energy calculation for all 14 constructs using either native uridine or pseudouridine. The blue-dashed line represents the mean of the native uridine calculation, and the red line represents the mean of the psuedouridine calculation. ∗ p < 0.05, paired t test. (F) Distribution of centroid free energy of all 14 EGFP encoding constructs including HBA1 5′ UTR, corrected for the usage of pseudouridine instead of native uridine. Constructs with energy lower than HBA1 5′ UTR are predicted to be more stable and thus enhance expression, while constructs with energy higher than HBA1 5′ UTR are predicated to be less stable and impair expression.
Moderna S Covid 19 Mrna Vaccines, supplied by Moderna, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/moderna s covid 19 mrna vaccines/product/Moderna
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
moderna s covid 19 mrna vaccines - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Novoprotein egfp mrna
Schematic illustration of in vivo tumor immunotherapy enhanced by <t>mRNA/HNPs</t> through intravenous injection. H18 lipid, DOPE, cholesterol, DMG-PEG 2000 and mRNA were mixed to form mRNA/H 18 NPs with the special multilamellar concentric nanostructures. Following intravenous administration, mRNA/H 18 NPs demonstrated preferential adsorption of complement C3 proteins to form a characteristic protein corona, resulting in specific mRNA transfection in the spleen, especially in splenic dendritic cells. When encapsulating tumor antigen-encoding mRNA, the mRNA/H 18 NPs achieved precise transfection of the antigen mRNA in splenic dendritic cells. This targeted delivery stimulated dendritic cell maturation and subsequent antigen presentation, initiating robust T cell priming. The activated antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes then infiltrated into tumor tissues, ultimately inducing tumor cell elimination.
Egfp Mrna, supplied by Novoprotein, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/egfp mrna/product/Novoprotein
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
egfp mrna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Novoprotein luciferase mrna
Schematic illustration of in vivo tumor immunotherapy enhanced by <t>mRNA/HNPs</t> through intravenous injection. H18 lipid, DOPE, cholesterol, DMG-PEG 2000 and mRNA were mixed to form mRNA/H 18 NPs with the special multilamellar concentric nanostructures. Following intravenous administration, mRNA/H 18 NPs demonstrated preferential adsorption of complement C3 proteins to form a characteristic protein corona, resulting in specific mRNA transfection in the spleen, especially in splenic dendritic cells. When encapsulating tumor antigen-encoding mRNA, the mRNA/H 18 NPs achieved precise transfection of the antigen mRNA in splenic dendritic cells. This targeted delivery stimulated dendritic cell maturation and subsequent antigen presentation, initiating robust T cell priming. The activated antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes then infiltrated into tumor tissues, ultimately inducing tumor cell elimination.
Luciferase Mrna, supplied by Novoprotein, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/luciferase mrna/product/Novoprotein
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
luciferase mrna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Thermo Fisher glyceride hyde 3 phosphate dehydrogenase gapdh mrna
Schematic illustration of in vivo tumor immunotherapy enhanced by <t>mRNA/HNPs</t> through intravenous injection. H18 lipid, DOPE, cholesterol, DMG-PEG 2000 and mRNA were mixed to form mRNA/H 18 NPs with the special multilamellar concentric nanostructures. Following intravenous administration, mRNA/H 18 NPs demonstrated preferential adsorption of complement C3 proteins to form a characteristic protein corona, resulting in specific mRNA transfection in the spleen, especially in splenic dendritic cells. When encapsulating tumor antigen-encoding mRNA, the mRNA/H 18 NPs achieved precise transfection of the antigen mRNA in splenic dendritic cells. This targeted delivery stimulated dendritic cell maturation and subsequent antigen presentation, initiating robust T cell priming. The activated antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes then infiltrated into tumor tissues, ultimately inducing tumor cell elimination.
Glyceride Hyde 3 Phosphate Dehydrogenase Gapdh Mrna, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/glyceride hyde 3 phosphate dehydrogenase gapdh mrna/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
glyceride hyde 3 phosphate dehydrogenase gapdh mrna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Generation of 5′ UTR library for T cell-specific gene expression (A) General scheme of mRNA constructs used throughout the research. The constructs are composed of replaceable 5′ UTRs, KOZAK sequence, a gene of interest (GOI), a conserved 3′ UTR of HBA1 which is shared in all constructs, and a poly-A sequence. (B) GC/AU contents for each 5′ UTR used in the study. (C) Centroid secondary structure and free energy for EGFP-encoding constructs using the 5′ UTR of TOX , HBA1 , and CD39 ( ENTPD1 ). (D) Psuedouridine-corrected centroid secondary structure and free energy for EGFP-encoding constructs using the 5′ UTR of IL 2 , HBA1 , and CD247 . (E) Centroid free-energy calculation for all 14 constructs using either native uridine or pseudouridine. The blue-dashed line represents the mean of the native uridine calculation, and the red line represents the mean of the psuedouridine calculation. ∗ p < 0.05, paired t test. (F) Distribution of centroid free energy of all 14 EGFP encoding constructs including HBA1 5′ UTR, corrected for the usage of pseudouridine instead of native uridine. Constructs with energy lower than HBA1 5′ UTR are predicted to be more stable and thus enhance expression, while constructs with energy higher than HBA1 5′ UTR are predicated to be less stable and impair expression.

Journal: Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids

Article Title: Engineered mRNA backbones for gene expression in human T cells

doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2026.102913

Figure Lengend Snippet: Generation of 5′ UTR library for T cell-specific gene expression (A) General scheme of mRNA constructs used throughout the research. The constructs are composed of replaceable 5′ UTRs, KOZAK sequence, a gene of interest (GOI), a conserved 3′ UTR of HBA1 which is shared in all constructs, and a poly-A sequence. (B) GC/AU contents for each 5′ UTR used in the study. (C) Centroid secondary structure and free energy for EGFP-encoding constructs using the 5′ UTR of TOX , HBA1 , and CD39 ( ENTPD1 ). (D) Psuedouridine-corrected centroid secondary structure and free energy for EGFP-encoding constructs using the 5′ UTR of IL 2 , HBA1 , and CD247 . (E) Centroid free-energy calculation for all 14 constructs using either native uridine or pseudouridine. The blue-dashed line represents the mean of the native uridine calculation, and the red line represents the mean of the psuedouridine calculation. ∗ p < 0.05, paired t test. (F) Distribution of centroid free energy of all 14 EGFP encoding constructs including HBA1 5′ UTR, corrected for the usage of pseudouridine instead of native uridine. Constructs with energy lower than HBA1 5′ UTR are predicted to be more stable and thus enhance expression, while constructs with energy higher than HBA1 5′ UTR are predicated to be less stable and impair expression.

Article Snippet: IVT was performed using the HiScribe T7 ARCA mRNA Kit (NEB #E2065S) enriched with pseudouridine-UTP (Ψ-UTP).

Techniques: Gene Expression, Construct, Sequencing, Expressing

Modulation of gene reporter expression using T cell-specific UTRs (A) Representative flow cytometry analysis of PBMC-derived T cells mock-electroporated or electroporated with EGFP-encoding constructs using either α-globin or IFN G 5′ UTR. Data are collected 24 h post-electroporation. Plots are representative of 3 independent donors. (B) Full analysis of PBMC-derived T cell EGFP MFI across days from electroporation. Data are relative to EGFP expression using HBA1 5′ UTR. (C) Plot of centroid minimal energy, corrected for pseudouridine usage as in F, by normalized EGFP expression at day 2, compared with expression of HBA1 5′-UTR- EGFP. Correlation bar is in red. Note the low correlation. (D) Luciferase activity in PBMC-derived T cells electroporated with mRNA constructs harboring various 5′ UTRs, 24 h post-electroporation. Data are shown relative to the HBA1 control and represent mean ± SEM ( n = 3). (E) Luciferase activity in melanoma-derived tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes electroporated with mRNA constructs harboring various 5′ UTRs. Data are shown relative to the HBA1 control and represent mean ± SEM ( n = 3). (F) Representative flow cytometry analysis of HEK293 cells electroporated with mRNA constructs harboring various 5′ UTRs. (G) Full analysis of HEK293 cell EGFP MFI 24 h post-electroporation. Data are relative to EGFP expression using HBA1 5′ UTR. Data represent mean ± SEM ( n = 2). (H) Full analysis of HEK293 cell luciferase 24 h post-electroporation. Data are relative to luciferase activity using HBA1 5′ UTR. Data are normalized to HBA1 and presented as mean ± SEM ( n = 2).

Journal: Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids

Article Title: Engineered mRNA backbones for gene expression in human T cells

doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2026.102913

Figure Lengend Snippet: Modulation of gene reporter expression using T cell-specific UTRs (A) Representative flow cytometry analysis of PBMC-derived T cells mock-electroporated or electroporated with EGFP-encoding constructs using either α-globin or IFN G 5′ UTR. Data are collected 24 h post-electroporation. Plots are representative of 3 independent donors. (B) Full analysis of PBMC-derived T cell EGFP MFI across days from electroporation. Data are relative to EGFP expression using HBA1 5′ UTR. (C) Plot of centroid minimal energy, corrected for pseudouridine usage as in F, by normalized EGFP expression at day 2, compared with expression of HBA1 5′-UTR- EGFP. Correlation bar is in red. Note the low correlation. (D) Luciferase activity in PBMC-derived T cells electroporated with mRNA constructs harboring various 5′ UTRs, 24 h post-electroporation. Data are shown relative to the HBA1 control and represent mean ± SEM ( n = 3). (E) Luciferase activity in melanoma-derived tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes electroporated with mRNA constructs harboring various 5′ UTRs. Data are shown relative to the HBA1 control and represent mean ± SEM ( n = 3). (F) Representative flow cytometry analysis of HEK293 cells electroporated with mRNA constructs harboring various 5′ UTRs. (G) Full analysis of HEK293 cell EGFP MFI 24 h post-electroporation. Data are relative to EGFP expression using HBA1 5′ UTR. Data represent mean ± SEM ( n = 2). (H) Full analysis of HEK293 cell luciferase 24 h post-electroporation. Data are relative to luciferase activity using HBA1 5′ UTR. Data are normalized to HBA1 and presented as mean ± SEM ( n = 2).

Article Snippet: IVT was performed using the HiScribe T7 ARCA mRNA Kit (NEB #E2065S) enriched with pseudouridine-UTP (Ψ-UTP).

Techniques: Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Derivative Assay, Construct, Electroporation, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Control

T cell-specific UTRs for optimized CAR expression, reactivity, and tonic signaling (A). Representative flow cytometry analysis of PBMC-derived T cells electroporated with CD19-CAR-encoding constructs using various 5′ UTRs. (B) Quantification of percentages of CD19-CAR + cells in (A). Data are normalized to the HBA1 UTR condition and presented as mean ± SEM from four independent experiments ( n = 4). Kruskal-Wallis test revealed no statistically significant difference ( p = 0.29). (C) MFI of CD19-CAR + cells in (A) normalized to the HBA1 UTR. Data represent four independent experiments ( n = 4). Kruskal-Wallis test indicated a significant difference among groups ( p < 0.005); Dunn’s post hoc test revealed significant reduction in the TNF-UTR group compared to HBA1 ( p = 0.0022). (D) Secreted IFN-γ levels in co-culture supernatants of PBMC-derived T cells electroporated with CD19-CAR mRNA using different 5′ UTRs and CD19 + NALM6 target cells. Data from two healthy donors (D29 and D40) are shown at various effector-to-target (E:T) ratios. (E) Left: interferon gamma ELISA in media taken from co-cultures of PBMC-derived T cells electroporated with CD19-CAR mRNA using different UTRs, either together with CD19 + (filled) or CD19 − (NALM6 KO, empty) at an E:T ratio of 4:1. Right: delta of interferon gamma secretion of E between the co-culture of electroporated T cells with CD19 + vs. CD19 − NALM6 cells. Bars represent mean ± SEM, n = 5 (CD19 + co-cultures) and n = 2 (CD19 − co-cultures) per construct. (F) Flow cytometry analysis of virus-specific T cells (VSTs) electroporated with mRNA constructs encoding for CD19-CAR using various UTRs. Note that cells are grown without target cells to demonstrate tonic signaling. (G) Pie charts of PD-1/TIM-3 population distribution of (F). Data are representative of two independent experiments.

Journal: Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids

Article Title: Engineered mRNA backbones for gene expression in human T cells

doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2026.102913

Figure Lengend Snippet: T cell-specific UTRs for optimized CAR expression, reactivity, and tonic signaling (A). Representative flow cytometry analysis of PBMC-derived T cells electroporated with CD19-CAR-encoding constructs using various 5′ UTRs. (B) Quantification of percentages of CD19-CAR + cells in (A). Data are normalized to the HBA1 UTR condition and presented as mean ± SEM from four independent experiments ( n = 4). Kruskal-Wallis test revealed no statistically significant difference ( p = 0.29). (C) MFI of CD19-CAR + cells in (A) normalized to the HBA1 UTR. Data represent four independent experiments ( n = 4). Kruskal-Wallis test indicated a significant difference among groups ( p < 0.005); Dunn’s post hoc test revealed significant reduction in the TNF-UTR group compared to HBA1 ( p = 0.0022). (D) Secreted IFN-γ levels in co-culture supernatants of PBMC-derived T cells electroporated with CD19-CAR mRNA using different 5′ UTRs and CD19 + NALM6 target cells. Data from two healthy donors (D29 and D40) are shown at various effector-to-target (E:T) ratios. (E) Left: interferon gamma ELISA in media taken from co-cultures of PBMC-derived T cells electroporated with CD19-CAR mRNA using different UTRs, either together with CD19 + (filled) or CD19 − (NALM6 KO, empty) at an E:T ratio of 4:1. Right: delta of interferon gamma secretion of E between the co-culture of electroporated T cells with CD19 + vs. CD19 − NALM6 cells. Bars represent mean ± SEM, n = 5 (CD19 + co-cultures) and n = 2 (CD19 − co-cultures) per construct. (F) Flow cytometry analysis of virus-specific T cells (VSTs) electroporated with mRNA constructs encoding for CD19-CAR using various UTRs. Note that cells are grown without target cells to demonstrate tonic signaling. (G) Pie charts of PD-1/TIM-3 population distribution of (F). Data are representative of two independent experiments.

Article Snippet: IVT was performed using the HiScribe T7 ARCA mRNA Kit (NEB #E2065S) enriched with pseudouridine-UTP (Ψ-UTP).

Techniques: Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Derivative Assay, Construct, Co-Culture Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Virus

Schematic illustration of in vivo tumor immunotherapy enhanced by mRNA/HNPs through intravenous injection. H18 lipid, DOPE, cholesterol, DMG-PEG 2000 and mRNA were mixed to form mRNA/H 18 NPs with the special multilamellar concentric nanostructures. Following intravenous administration, mRNA/H 18 NPs demonstrated preferential adsorption of complement C3 proteins to form a characteristic protein corona, resulting in specific mRNA transfection in the spleen, especially in splenic dendritic cells. When encapsulating tumor antigen-encoding mRNA, the mRNA/H 18 NPs achieved precise transfection of the antigen mRNA in splenic dendritic cells. This targeted delivery stimulated dendritic cell maturation and subsequent antigen presentation, initiating robust T cell priming. The activated antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes then infiltrated into tumor tissues, ultimately inducing tumor cell elimination.

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: Splenic dendritic cell-targeting mRNA transfection of H-type ionizable lipid-based LNPs for enhancing tumor immunotherapy

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.018

Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic illustration of in vivo tumor immunotherapy enhanced by mRNA/HNPs through intravenous injection. H18 lipid, DOPE, cholesterol, DMG-PEG 2000 and mRNA were mixed to form mRNA/H 18 NPs with the special multilamellar concentric nanostructures. Following intravenous administration, mRNA/H 18 NPs demonstrated preferential adsorption of complement C3 proteins to form a characteristic protein corona, resulting in specific mRNA transfection in the spleen, especially in splenic dendritic cells. When encapsulating tumor antigen-encoding mRNA, the mRNA/H 18 NPs achieved precise transfection of the antigen mRNA in splenic dendritic cells. This targeted delivery stimulated dendritic cell maturation and subsequent antigen presentation, initiating robust T cell priming. The activated antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes then infiltrated into tumor tissues, ultimately inducing tumor cell elimination.

Article Snippet: Luciferase mRNA, OVA mRNA, and EGFP mRNA were purchased from Novoprotein (Suzhou, China).

Techniques: In Vivo, Injection, Adsorption, Transfection, Immunopeptidomics

Preparation and Characterization of Optimal mRNA/H 18 NPs. (A) Schematic illustration of mRNA/H 18 NPs preparation. (B) The size distribution and (C) zeta potential of optimized mRNA/H 18 NPs. (D) The apparent p K a of mRNA/H 18 NPs. (E) Cryo-EM image of optimized mRNA/H 18 NPs. Scale bar = 50 nm. (F) Representative image and percentage of bioluminescence in major organs of mice following intravenous injection of mLuc/H 18 NPs. (G)-(I) Stability test for mRNA/H 18 NPs. (G) Size and PDI of mRNA/H 18 NPs when stored at 4 °C for different days (0, 3, 5, 7). (H) Left: Total bioluminescence flux in the spleen of mice 6 h after intravenous injection of mLuc/H 18 NPs stored at 4 °C for different days (0, 3, 5, 7). Right: Representative bioluminescence images of major organs of mice 6 h after intravenous injection of different mLuc/H 18 NPs stored at 4 °C for different days (0, 3, 5, 7). (I) Size and PDI of mRNA/H 18 NPs when diluted with PBS by different times. Data were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3).

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: Splenic dendritic cell-targeting mRNA transfection of H-type ionizable lipid-based LNPs for enhancing tumor immunotherapy

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.018

Figure Lengend Snippet: Preparation and Characterization of Optimal mRNA/H 18 NPs. (A) Schematic illustration of mRNA/H 18 NPs preparation. (B) The size distribution and (C) zeta potential of optimized mRNA/H 18 NPs. (D) The apparent p K a of mRNA/H 18 NPs. (E) Cryo-EM image of optimized mRNA/H 18 NPs. Scale bar = 50 nm. (F) Representative image and percentage of bioluminescence in major organs of mice following intravenous injection of mLuc/H 18 NPs. (G)-(I) Stability test for mRNA/H 18 NPs. (G) Size and PDI of mRNA/H 18 NPs when stored at 4 °C for different days (0, 3, 5, 7). (H) Left: Total bioluminescence flux in the spleen of mice 6 h after intravenous injection of mLuc/H 18 NPs stored at 4 °C for different days (0, 3, 5, 7). Right: Representative bioluminescence images of major organs of mice 6 h after intravenous injection of different mLuc/H 18 NPs stored at 4 °C for different days (0, 3, 5, 7). (I) Size and PDI of mRNA/H 18 NPs when diluted with PBS by different times. Data were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3).

Article Snippet: Luciferase mRNA, OVA mRNA, and EGFP mRNA were purchased from Novoprotein (Suzhou, China).

Techniques: Zeta Potential Analyzer, Cryo-EM Sample Prep, Injection

In vivo splenic DC-specific transfection of mRNA/H 18 NPs and in vitro protein corona analysis of mRNA/H 18 NPs. (A) EGFP protein expression in splenic cell subsets of C57BL/6J mice 24 h post intravenous injection of different formulations. (B) The top 5 most abundant plasma proteins adsorbed on mRNA/H 18 NPs (C3: Complement C3; Ighm: Immunoglobulin heavy constant mu; Hbat1: Alpha-globin; Itih4: Inter alpha-trypsin inhibitor, heavy chain 4; Cnn2: Calponin). (C) Heatmap plot of major proteins in the protein corona adsorbed on mRNA/MC3-LNPs and mRNA/H 18 NPs. PBS group was used as a negative control. (D) Quantification of major adsorbed protein categories of different formulations. (E) Complement C3 abundance in protein corona adsorbed on mRNA/MC3-LNPs and mRNA/H 18 NPs. (F) Bioluminescence images of major organs and (G) Quantification of total bioluminescence flux in the spleen from C57BL/6J mice 6 h after intravenous injection of mLuc/H 18 NPs (mLuc dose of 0.25 mg kg −1 ). Mice were pre-treated with cobra venom factor (CVF) or PBS. (H) Fluorescence quantification of Cy5 mRNA delivered by uncoated or complement C3-coated Cy5-mRNA/H 18 NPs in BMDCs. BMDCs were pre-incubated with anti-CD11b (CR3) or anti-IgG blocking antibody. (I) Bioluminescence intensity of luciferase protein translated from mRNA delivered by uncoated or complement C3-coated mLuc/H 18 NPs in BMDCs. BMDCs were pre-incubated with anti-CD11b (CR3) or anti-IgG blocking antibody. Data were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3).

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: Splenic dendritic cell-targeting mRNA transfection of H-type ionizable lipid-based LNPs for enhancing tumor immunotherapy

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.018

Figure Lengend Snippet: In vivo splenic DC-specific transfection of mRNA/H 18 NPs and in vitro protein corona analysis of mRNA/H 18 NPs. (A) EGFP protein expression in splenic cell subsets of C57BL/6J mice 24 h post intravenous injection of different formulations. (B) The top 5 most abundant plasma proteins adsorbed on mRNA/H 18 NPs (C3: Complement C3; Ighm: Immunoglobulin heavy constant mu; Hbat1: Alpha-globin; Itih4: Inter alpha-trypsin inhibitor, heavy chain 4; Cnn2: Calponin). (C) Heatmap plot of major proteins in the protein corona adsorbed on mRNA/MC3-LNPs and mRNA/H 18 NPs. PBS group was used as a negative control. (D) Quantification of major adsorbed protein categories of different formulations. (E) Complement C3 abundance in protein corona adsorbed on mRNA/MC3-LNPs and mRNA/H 18 NPs. (F) Bioluminescence images of major organs and (G) Quantification of total bioluminescence flux in the spleen from C57BL/6J mice 6 h after intravenous injection of mLuc/H 18 NPs (mLuc dose of 0.25 mg kg −1 ). Mice were pre-treated with cobra venom factor (CVF) or PBS. (H) Fluorescence quantification of Cy5 mRNA delivered by uncoated or complement C3-coated Cy5-mRNA/H 18 NPs in BMDCs. BMDCs were pre-incubated with anti-CD11b (CR3) or anti-IgG blocking antibody. (I) Bioluminescence intensity of luciferase protein translated from mRNA delivered by uncoated or complement C3-coated mLuc/H 18 NPs in BMDCs. BMDCs were pre-incubated with anti-CD11b (CR3) or anti-IgG blocking antibody. Data were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3).

Article Snippet: Luciferase mRNA, OVA mRNA, and EGFP mRNA were purchased from Novoprotein (Suzhou, China).

Techniques: In Vivo, Transfection, In Vitro, Expressing, Injection, Clinical Proteomics, Negative Control, Combined Bisulfite Restriction Analysis Assay, Fluorescence, Incubation, Blocking Assay, Luciferase

Schematic illustration of in vivo tumor immunotherapy enhanced by mRNA/HNPs through intravenous injection. H18 lipid, DOPE, cholesterol, DMG-PEG 2000 and mRNA were mixed to form mRNA/H 18 NPs with the special multilamellar concentric nanostructures. Following intravenous administration, mRNA/H 18 NPs demonstrated preferential adsorption of complement C3 proteins to form a characteristic protein corona, resulting in specific mRNA transfection in the spleen, especially in splenic dendritic cells. When encapsulating tumor antigen-encoding mRNA, the mRNA/H 18 NPs achieved precise transfection of the antigen mRNA in splenic dendritic cells. This targeted delivery stimulated dendritic cell maturation and subsequent antigen presentation, initiating robust T cell priming. The activated antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes then infiltrated into tumor tissues, ultimately inducing tumor cell elimination.

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: Splenic dendritic cell-targeting mRNA transfection of H-type ionizable lipid-based LNPs for enhancing tumor immunotherapy

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.018

Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic illustration of in vivo tumor immunotherapy enhanced by mRNA/HNPs through intravenous injection. H18 lipid, DOPE, cholesterol, DMG-PEG 2000 and mRNA were mixed to form mRNA/H 18 NPs with the special multilamellar concentric nanostructures. Following intravenous administration, mRNA/H 18 NPs demonstrated preferential adsorption of complement C3 proteins to form a characteristic protein corona, resulting in specific mRNA transfection in the spleen, especially in splenic dendritic cells. When encapsulating tumor antigen-encoding mRNA, the mRNA/H 18 NPs achieved precise transfection of the antigen mRNA in splenic dendritic cells. This targeted delivery stimulated dendritic cell maturation and subsequent antigen presentation, initiating robust T cell priming. The activated antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes then infiltrated into tumor tissues, ultimately inducing tumor cell elimination.

Article Snippet: Luciferase mRNA, OVA mRNA, and EGFP mRNA were purchased from Novoprotein (Suzhou, China).

Techniques: In Vivo, Injection, Adsorption, Transfection, Immunopeptidomics

Preparation and Characterization of Optimal mRNA/H 18 NPs. (A) Schematic illustration of mRNA/H 18 NPs preparation. (B) The size distribution and (C) zeta potential of optimized mRNA/H 18 NPs. (D) The apparent p K a of mRNA/H 18 NPs. (E) Cryo-EM image of optimized mRNA/H 18 NPs. Scale bar = 50 nm. (F) Representative image and percentage of bioluminescence in major organs of mice following intravenous injection of mLuc/H 18 NPs. (G)-(I) Stability test for mRNA/H 18 NPs. (G) Size and PDI of mRNA/H 18 NPs when stored at 4 °C for different days (0, 3, 5, 7). (H) Left: Total bioluminescence flux in the spleen of mice 6 h after intravenous injection of mLuc/H 18 NPs stored at 4 °C for different days (0, 3, 5, 7). Right: Representative bioluminescence images of major organs of mice 6 h after intravenous injection of different mLuc/H 18 NPs stored at 4 °C for different days (0, 3, 5, 7). (I) Size and PDI of mRNA/H 18 NPs when diluted with PBS by different times. Data were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3).

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: Splenic dendritic cell-targeting mRNA transfection of H-type ionizable lipid-based LNPs for enhancing tumor immunotherapy

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.018

Figure Lengend Snippet: Preparation and Characterization of Optimal mRNA/H 18 NPs. (A) Schematic illustration of mRNA/H 18 NPs preparation. (B) The size distribution and (C) zeta potential of optimized mRNA/H 18 NPs. (D) The apparent p K a of mRNA/H 18 NPs. (E) Cryo-EM image of optimized mRNA/H 18 NPs. Scale bar = 50 nm. (F) Representative image and percentage of bioluminescence in major organs of mice following intravenous injection of mLuc/H 18 NPs. (G)-(I) Stability test for mRNA/H 18 NPs. (G) Size and PDI of mRNA/H 18 NPs when stored at 4 °C for different days (0, 3, 5, 7). (H) Left: Total bioluminescence flux in the spleen of mice 6 h after intravenous injection of mLuc/H 18 NPs stored at 4 °C for different days (0, 3, 5, 7). Right: Representative bioluminescence images of major organs of mice 6 h after intravenous injection of different mLuc/H 18 NPs stored at 4 °C for different days (0, 3, 5, 7). (I) Size and PDI of mRNA/H 18 NPs when diluted with PBS by different times. Data were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3).

Article Snippet: Luciferase mRNA, OVA mRNA, and EGFP mRNA were purchased from Novoprotein (Suzhou, China).

Techniques: Zeta Potential Analyzer, Cryo-EM Sample Prep, Injection

In vivo splenic DC-specific transfection of mRNA/H 18 NPs and in vitro protein corona analysis of mRNA/H 18 NPs. (A) EGFP protein expression in splenic cell subsets of C57BL/6J mice 24 h post intravenous injection of different formulations. (B) The top 5 most abundant plasma proteins adsorbed on mRNA/H 18 NPs (C3: Complement C3; Ighm: Immunoglobulin heavy constant mu; Hbat1: Alpha-globin; Itih4: Inter alpha-trypsin inhibitor, heavy chain 4; Cnn2: Calponin). (C) Heatmap plot of major proteins in the protein corona adsorbed on mRNA/MC3-LNPs and mRNA/H 18 NPs. PBS group was used as a negative control. (D) Quantification of major adsorbed protein categories of different formulations. (E) Complement C3 abundance in protein corona adsorbed on mRNA/MC3-LNPs and mRNA/H 18 NPs. (F) Bioluminescence images of major organs and (G) Quantification of total bioluminescence flux in the spleen from C57BL/6J mice 6 h after intravenous injection of mLuc/H 18 NPs (mLuc dose of 0.25 mg kg −1 ). Mice were pre-treated with cobra venom factor (CVF) or PBS. (H) Fluorescence quantification of Cy5 mRNA delivered by uncoated or complement C3-coated Cy5-mRNA/H 18 NPs in BMDCs. BMDCs were pre-incubated with anti-CD11b (CR3) or anti-IgG blocking antibody. (I) Bioluminescence intensity of luciferase protein translated from mRNA delivered by uncoated or complement C3-coated mLuc/H 18 NPs in BMDCs. BMDCs were pre-incubated with anti-CD11b (CR3) or anti-IgG blocking antibody. Data were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3).

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: Splenic dendritic cell-targeting mRNA transfection of H-type ionizable lipid-based LNPs for enhancing tumor immunotherapy

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.018

Figure Lengend Snippet: In vivo splenic DC-specific transfection of mRNA/H 18 NPs and in vitro protein corona analysis of mRNA/H 18 NPs. (A) EGFP protein expression in splenic cell subsets of C57BL/6J mice 24 h post intravenous injection of different formulations. (B) The top 5 most abundant plasma proteins adsorbed on mRNA/H 18 NPs (C3: Complement C3; Ighm: Immunoglobulin heavy constant mu; Hbat1: Alpha-globin; Itih4: Inter alpha-trypsin inhibitor, heavy chain 4; Cnn2: Calponin). (C) Heatmap plot of major proteins in the protein corona adsorbed on mRNA/MC3-LNPs and mRNA/H 18 NPs. PBS group was used as a negative control. (D) Quantification of major adsorbed protein categories of different formulations. (E) Complement C3 abundance in protein corona adsorbed on mRNA/MC3-LNPs and mRNA/H 18 NPs. (F) Bioluminescence images of major organs and (G) Quantification of total bioluminescence flux in the spleen from C57BL/6J mice 6 h after intravenous injection of mLuc/H 18 NPs (mLuc dose of 0.25 mg kg −1 ). Mice were pre-treated with cobra venom factor (CVF) or PBS. (H) Fluorescence quantification of Cy5 mRNA delivered by uncoated or complement C3-coated Cy5-mRNA/H 18 NPs in BMDCs. BMDCs were pre-incubated with anti-CD11b (CR3) or anti-IgG blocking antibody. (I) Bioluminescence intensity of luciferase protein translated from mRNA delivered by uncoated or complement C3-coated mLuc/H 18 NPs in BMDCs. BMDCs were pre-incubated with anti-CD11b (CR3) or anti-IgG blocking antibody. Data were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3).

Article Snippet: Luciferase mRNA, OVA mRNA, and EGFP mRNA were purchased from Novoprotein (Suzhou, China).

Techniques: In Vivo, Transfection, In Vitro, Expressing, Injection, Clinical Proteomics, Negative Control, Combined Bisulfite Restriction Analysis Assay, Fluorescence, Incubation, Blocking Assay, Luciferase